"My architects, Kahn and Khan"

By Shuvo Rahman,M Gulshan, Dhaka
29 January 2004, 18:00 PM
Sorry, but I do not get the point of the writer's view published in the DS (23/01/04, "My Architect, Kahn and Khan"). Please enlighten us: what is so 'dubious' about Luis Kahn in creating an architectural masterpiece for Bangladesh. Is it the misuse of taxpayers' money or his design did not reflect people's aspirations?

Ayub Khan is not a praise worthy man ­ nobody is disputing that, but despite his own agenda, the fact that he decided to commission such a work in Bangladesh but not in Pakistan is a fact and let's not criticise him for that. I think we have the right to be emotional and be proud that such a landmark architectural piece was built in our own country, just as the Egyptians, Indians and Cambodians take pride in their Pyramid, Taj Mahal and Angkor Wat. All three were slave-built. None reflected then common people's aspirations. None were 'proper' use of taxpayer's money.

If we are concerned about misuse of public fund and cultural reflection, let's pick more relevant topics: Airport Road beautification project and the neon signboards beaming from the top of our airport, but not Kahn and Khan.