RAB

Crossfire is the term being used right from the beginning RAB began its operation? RAB says, and we all know, that in a crossfire both sides exchange firing. Or else, it won't be called crossfire, but would be called an "encounter."

Now, I have a question. If it was not an encounter, then how come none of the RAB personnel got killed or even hurt in so many crossfire incidents. It indicates that the criminals did not open fire on them. Specially when those criminals are said to be notorious criminals, who have killed a lot of people, how on earth does RAB escape their bullets?

In a democratic country under the rule of law, could anyone or any institution or organisation be ever licensed to kill? If so, then there is no meaning to the existence of courts of law. And now, people will start killing each other if they have any allegations towards someone. If RAB's actions be supported like this, then no one will ever go to the court to seek justice ever again. Are we heading towards such a future in this country? If anyone is guilty of any crime, let the court decide. Why kill? And that too in encounters disguised as crossfire? It's high time for us to think about what the future holds for us.