TIB again!

By Sirajul Islam, Social sciences researcher and consultant, Pisciculture Housing Society, Shyamoli, Dh
5 September 2004, 18:00 PM
TIB generated heat again in Bangladesh, they angered especially the law minister who told Channel i last night that he was thinking of filing a defamation suit against the organisation that publishes corruption index. But how do people view corruption? Obviously, less positively, suggesting that it distorts economic decisions. For example, corruption might result in the misallocation of talent to occupations with large opportunities for rent seeking, might bias authority towards purchases on which it is easier to collect bribes, or might affect income distribution.

Consistent with the less flattering view of corruption, it hampers growth, reduces income, increases inequality and reduces investment, can increase the size of the unofficial economy, and is associated with lower levels of human capital, urbanisation, financial depth, and foreign trade. Corruption is lower in countries that are more open to foreign trade, countries with longer exposure to democracy, countries that are more democratic, countries with greater political stability and greater freedom of the press, and countries with parliamentary systems.

TIB looks at newspaper level data on bribes paid in sectors of the economy. This allows people to understand the persons or enterprises that pay and receive bribes in addition to the characteristics of the institutional and macroeconomic environment. People may find, going through the report, that excess demand is an important determinant of corruption. Bribes are lower where the utility services of the ministries have been privatised. One potential explanation for this is that private sector might have a greater incentive than public servants to impose stiff penalties upon employees taking bribes and reducing bribe payments.