Why this change?

By Wali, On e-mail
17 August 2006, 18:00 PM
Please refer to the news item published in your daily on 11 July 2006 entitled, "By-polls in vacant parliamentary seat; Draft bill okayed to extend time limit to 180 days."

To my mind, as a concerned citizen of Bangladesh, the effort looks ominous for the following reasons:

1. The new EC headed by the much talked about CEC seems to have orchestrated this amendment through PMO with a view to avoiding a test exam prior to the final exam.

2.The law minister refers to 'some countries' having provisions to nominate MPs in the seats falling vacant and to Malaysia with a provision of an approved period of two years for bi-election of MPs. He is, however, conspicuously silent about the provisions of British and/or Indian parliaments to this effect, from where we inherited our parliamentary democracy.

3. The rationale of the benefit of the people to be able to gauge the popularity of the political parties just prior to the general election didn't merit any consideration!

4. The rationale of the benefit of the EC to be able to hold a dress rehearsal prior to the major drama, also didn't merit any consideration!